Friday, September 30, 2016

Today's Non-Endorsement Roundup


From USA TODAY:
In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now. 
This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency. 
From the day he declared his candidacy 15 months ago through this week’s first presidential debate, Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he lacks the temperament, knowledge, steadiness and honesty that America needs from its presidents.  [snip] 
We’ve been highly critical of the GOP nominee in a number of previous editorials. With early voting already underway in several states and polls showing a close race, now is the time to spell out, in one place, the reasons Trump should not be president... (our emphasis)
What follows are reality- based reasons like "He is erratic," "He is ill- equipped to be commander in chief,""He traffics in prejudice," "He's a serial liar," and more.

Unfortunately, while the editorial board was unanimous in its decision to urge readers to vote their consciences, "just not for Trump," it did not have a consensus in favor of endorsing Hillary Clinton -- to which we would only add -- see post below.

No comments: