Saturday, December 28, 2013

Benghazi! BENGHAZI!! BEN…huh? No?

From a months-long New York Times investigation:
"Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam."  (emphasis added)
This turns everything upside down that the Rethugs and their right wing media allies have been pushing in order to score points against presumed Presidential candidate Secretary Hillary Clinton.  Let's see if this investigation gets the same mileage as some of the trash written and broadcast on the subject.

No comments: