The media definitely doesn't like someone. We wonder who:
The biggest news outlets have published more negative stories about Hillary Clinton than any other presidential candidate — including Donald Trump — since January 2015, according to a new analysis of hundreds of thousands of online stories published since last year.(click on image to enlarge)
Clinton has not only been hammered by the most negative coverage but the media also wrote the smallest proportion of positive stories about her, reports Crimson Hexagon, a social media software analytics company based out of Boston.
No doubt the Rupert "Aargh" Murdoch bullshit empire of Fox "News", the New York Post, and the Wall Street Journal contributed heavily to the negative coverage of Clinton; the hundreds of hate radio outlets have been peddling the same hair afire nonsense as well. (But it's also some ostensibly "liberal" sites, which is why we're finally through with the " -- Busters" at "Salon"* -- buh bye linky). The faux scandals that the "Republican puke funnel" has been feeding to the willing corporate media for the last year (Benghazi! e-mails! Clinton Foundation!) also have played their part. There's no doubt in our mind that this is the kind of attention Sen. Bernie Sanders would be getting if these outlets thought he would be the Democratic nominee (although it's rather shocking that Bernie already gets roughly the same negative coverage as full- blown neo- fascist demagogue Donald "Rump" Trump!). WTF!?
In the meantime, it looks like many in the media have fallen for the story line that Gov. John Kasich is (relatively speaking in the Republican Party) a "moderate."
Yeah, right.
"Moderate."
*UPDATE: Wonkette is fed up with "liberal" Salon, too.
