Your "liberal media," ladies and gentlemen:
Why does the @nytimes story about an assassination attempt against the Clintons need to include a paragraph about Terry McAuliffe and the “significant debts from the legal troubles that dogged Mr. Clinton’s presidency”? pic.twitter.com/R1SBiU9c4n— Benjamin Landy (@Ben_Landy) October 24, 2018
The @nytimes is more critical of Hillary Clinton in its article about a BOMB DELIVERED TO HER HOUSE than it is toward Donald Trump's racist panic incitement about Honduran migrants.— Matthew Chapman (@fawfulfan) October 24, 2018
Holy shit this totally gratuitous last graf of an article about a frigging bomb sent to the Clintons. Surprised they didn't go all the way and bring up her email server. pic.twitter.com/Dj7Kyai8Zi— Daniel Radosh (@danielradosh) October 24, 2018
The New York Effing Times just can't help themselves, can they? (The offensive paragraph has reportedly since been removed -- we won't give them the satisfaction of a click to verify.)
3 comments:
The NY Times sucks donkey balls. Theytake any chance they can to humiliate or denigrate HRC.
Agree100%, Diva, and I'm sick of it. They've been after her for years.
Diva & donnah - the continuing animus is just sickening, given the role they played in the run up to the 2016 election, plumping the email server bullshit.
Post a Comment