The Washington Post, hours after the New York Times broke the story (see post below), has confirmed that investigators on the Special Counsel's team are expressing frustration at
In his letter, Barr said that the special counsel did not establish a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. And he said that Mueller did not reach a conclusion “one way or the other” as to whether Trump’s conduct in office constituted obstruction of justice.
Absent that, Barr told lawmakers that he concluded the evidence was not sufficient to prove that the president obstructed justice.
But members of Mueller’s team have complained to close associates that the evidence they gathered on obstruction was alarming and significant.
"Alarming and significant... much more acute than Barr suggested."“It was much more acute than Barr suggested,” said one person, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the subject’s sensitivity. (our emphasis)
This is confirmation that this is a full-blown coverup by the utterly compromised, highly partisan
BONUS: Marcy Wheeler points out that the Times story also includes a valuable insight -- that the Mueller team prepared several summaries of the report, "possibly customized to each of several audiences..." So, where are those summaries, Mr. Barr?
(Photo: You can take the "honorable" off now.)
