Monday, April 19, 2021

QOTD -- Evangelical Men Seek Ways To "Measure Up"


Holy penis pump!  From Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion:

Numerous studies document the connection between American evangelicalism and male insecurity stemming from essentialist, phallocentric conceptions of masculinity. Yet data have often been confined to individuals’ responses in surveys or qualitative interviews. This limits our understanding because individuals may lie about the most personal sources of insecurity (even to themselves) and such data are difficult to aggregate to broader subcultural influences. Building on a moral communities’ framework, in this research note we analyze Google Trends data and focus on the prevalence of explicit searches for “male enhancement” terms and phrases, simultaneously indicating (1) the internalization of a subculture that prioritizes essentialist, phallocentric standards of masculinity and (2) a privately felt failure to meet those standards. Even after accounting for a host of state‐level confounds, the preponderance of evangelicals in a state consistently predicts more Google searches for terms and phrases like “male enhancement,” “ExtenZe,” “penis pump,” “penis enlargement,” and others. We theorize that the largely patriarchal―and increasingly embattled and radicalized―evangelical subculture explicitly or implicitly promotes equating masculinity with physical strength and size, leaving men influenced by that subculture (whether evangelical or not) to seek solutions for their privately felt failure to measure up.  (our emphasis)
See also KKK, Christian Identity groups, Oath Keepers, Three Percenters, low- IQAnon, all the gun- humping, democracy- hating ammosexuals everywhere, etc.


2 comments:

Victor said...

And dudes with big-ass pick-up trucks.
Especially the ones whose pick-up's bed is pristine - or damn close to it!
Here's my rule of thumb:
The bigger the pick-up truck, the bigger the dickishness of the dick who bought the damn thing to provide some cover for his tiny dick.

W. Hackwhacker said...

Victor -- there's definitely an inverse proportionality at work there!