"In the November election, the U.S. faces two futures. In one, the new president offers the country better prospects, relying on science, solid evidence and the willingness to learn from experience. She pushes policies that boost good jobs nationwide by embracing technology and clean energy. She supports education, public health and reproductive rights. She treats the climate crisis as the emergency it is and seeks to mitigate its catastrophic storms, fires and droughts.
"In the other future, the new president endangers public health and safety and rejects evidence, preferring instead nonsensical conspiracy fantasies. He ignores the climate crisis in favor of more pollution. He requires that federal officials show personal loyalty to him rather than upholding U.S. laws. He fills positions in federal science and other agencies with unqualified ideologues. He goads people into hate and division, and he inspires extremists at state and local levels to pass laws that disrupt education and make it harder to earn a living.
"Only
one of these futures will improve the fate of this country and the
world. That is why, for only the second time in our magazine’s 179-year
history, the editors of Scientific American are endorsing a candidate for president. That person is Kamala Harris..." -- the editorial board of Scientific American. The magazine has 3.5 million print and tablet readers worldwide and a social media audience of over 4 million.
(Image: Luca D'Urbino)
