Showing posts with label mainstream media cheerleading military actions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mainstream media cheerleading military actions. Show all posts

Monday, April 10, 2017

Monday Reading - The Incoherent Trump Regime And Its Dangerous Normalizers


As a few days have now passed since the boom boom flash bang look over there strike on Syria, some are reflecting on the danger posed by a beleaguered, inept regime, in the midst of major staff infighting and turnover, suddenly dropping into a Middle Eastern quagmire with no plan or exit strategy. All the while, clueless media provide exactly the wrong incentives to a narcissistic nitwit who's constantly looking for approval and validation. Here's some worthwhile Monday reading along those lines.

Republican #NeverTrump strategist Rick Wilson analyzes the trouble with the White (Supremacist) House of unfit shitgibbon Donald "Rump" Trump:
It took Donald Trump 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles to buy himself one day of kind coverage at the end of another otherwise terrible week. But what the president himself described as an impulsive reaction to heartrending photos of Syrian children gassed by Assad on his watch isn’t a coherent strategy to punish Assad for using chemical weapons. 
Even supporters who hoped the strike would show Trump as a he-man leader willing to grasp the saber of state in his tiny hands and rattle it firmly, it failed to paper over the political crisis consuming his White House as his staff and family have become warring factions seeking his favor so that the story has become not about the president’s goals, policies, or accomplishments, but a group of people around him who make the Borgias look like the Brady Bunch.
Trump is faced with terrible options when it comes to rearranging the deck chairs on the SS White House, and those of us who warned you this was inevitable are ordering popcorn. The cancer in the presidency isn’t his staff—though they reflect his shoddy intellect, his shallow impulsiveness, his loose grasp of reality, and Chinese-menu ideology. The problem is Trump himself, and nothing and no one can change that. (our emphasis)
Another #NeverTrumper, neo- con David Frum takes us through "Seven Lessons From Trump's Syria Strike," also focusing on the ad hoc, impetuous nature of Rump's boom boom distraction:
But here’s one thing we already know: There can have been no proper interagency process before the strike, because none of the relevant agencies of government other than the Department of Defense is properly staffed to join such a process. You can’t have a deputies’ meeting without deputies. 
Every decision presents risks and costs, and any responsible decision maker insists on a detailed itemization of those risks and those costs. That cannot have happened here. Trump has walked into a military confrontation that implicates regional and global security with only the haziest notion of what might go wrong. One friend of mine has warned: “If it were good foreign policy, Trump wouldn’t be doing it.” Foreign policy is hard, and even the best process does not guarantee good outcomes. Sometimes you get lucky, and can escape the consequences of a bad process. But the odds are the odds. Ninety-nine times out of one hundred, bad processes lead to ugly results(our emphasis)
Paul Krugman takes aim at the Rump regime's lack of policy coherence before taking this shot at our shallow, shiny- object- obsessed media:
Mr. Trump may like to claim that the media are biased against him, but the truth is that they’ve bent over backward in his favor. They want to seem balanced, even when there is no balance; they have been desperate for excuses to ignore the dubious circumstances of his election and his erratic behavior in office, and start treating him as a normal president. 
You may recall how, a month and a half ago, pundits eagerly declared that Mr. Trump “became the president of the United States today” because he managed to read a speech off a teleprompter without going off script. Then he started tweeting again. 
One might have expected that experience to serve as a lesson. But no: The U.S. fired off some missiles, and once again Mr. Trump “became president.” Aside from everything else, think about the incentives this creates. The Trump administration now knows that it can always crowd out reporting about its scandals and failures by bombing someone. (our emphasis)
All of these analyses are worth the read. In the meantime, stay focused and Resist.

(Photo: "Plan? My only plan is to drag the country down with me if I have to.")

Saturday, April 8, 2017

The Media On Syria: Deja Vu All Over Again



Following the cruise missile strikes into Syria, several commentators have questioned the news media (the main offender being cable news) for its knee-jerk fawning over neo- fascist Giant Toddler Donald "Rump" Trump's use of military force. Whether there's any plan involved (hint: there isn't), or whether the strikes were the most effective way to address the horrific use of chemical weapons by Syrian war criminal Assad (hint: maybe not), the cable news media couldn't be bothered to ask questions; they were too busy drooling over the boom- booms that they associated with Rump being "presidential." You can count on Fox "News" to be the loudest cheerleader, of course. But, as has been noted, two of the most egregious examples of this fawning were CNN's Fareed Zakaria and MSNBC's Brian Williams, as Washington Post media columnist Margaret Sullivan points out:
“I think Donald Trump became president of the United States last night,” declared Fareed Zakaria on CNN, after firing of 59 missiles at a Syrian military airfield late Thursday night. (His words sounded familiar, since CNN’s Van Jones made a nearly identical pronouncement after Trump’s first address to Congress.) [snip]
Brian Williams, on MSNBC, seemed mesmerized by the images of the strikes provided by the Pentagon. He used the word “beautiful” three times and alluded to a Leonard Cohen lyric — “I am guided by the beauty of our weapons” — without apparent irony. (our emphasis)
You can now add Zakaria to the list of discredited pundits easily distracted by loud noises and bright objects. You can't be disappointed in Williams; he's always been a lightweight with a weakness for mock heroics.

Print media was also taken up by the thrill of perhaps seeing the long- awaited (but never to happen) "pivot" of Rump into anything resembling a serious adult.

Sullivan quotes Mother Jones' Clara Jeffery's explanation for the media swoon, as well as something that's been missing in discussions of the sincerity of Rump's motivations (our emphasis):
“It’s dramatic. It’s good for TV, reporters get caught up in the moment, or, worse, jingoism.” 
She added: “Military action is viewed as inherently nonpartisan, opposition or skepticism as partisan. News organizations that are fearful of looking partisan can fall into the trap of failing to provide context.” 
And so, empathy as the president’s clear motivation is accepted, she said — “with no mention of the refugee ban keeping those kids out, no mention of Islamophobia that has informed his campaign and administration. How can you write about motive and not explore that hypocrisy?[snip] 
Groupthink, and a lack of proper skepticism, is something that we’ve seen many times before as the American news media watches an administration step to the brink of war. [=cough= Iraq =cough=] 
Finally, a tip as to how the media should be viewing this going forward (h/t Daily Kos):




(Photo:  Is that Brian Williams, famous war correspondent?)