More good news for the rule of law today. Sic 'em, Judge Sullivan!
The legal saga of President Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn continued Thursday when a judge asked the appeals court in Washington to revive his effort to scrutinize the Justice Department’s move to drop Flynn’s case.
The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will now decide whether to take a second look at U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan’s plan to examine whether the government’s move to undo Flynn’s plea of guilty is in the public interest.
Sullivan’s request for rehearing comes after a divided three-judge panel on June 24 ordered him to put an end to the case and said Sullivan was wrong to appoint a retired federal judge to argue against the government’s position.
Sic 'em, Judge Sullivan! Sullivan's petition can be read here.In response, Sullivan’s attorneys told the court that while the panel majority’s opinion is couched as a fact-bound ruling, it marks a “dramatic break from precedent” that “threatens to turn ordinary judicial process upside down.”
On June 24, Trump- appointed
A few pro comments --
BREAKING: Judge Sullivan is seeking en banc review of the terrible DC Cir. decision that he can’t look into the bogus DOJ dismissal of the Flynn case.
Of course he can. I predict he will get en banc review & they will reverse.
As they should.
PS Big rule of law day today! pic.twitter.com/m6V3Vxs2o7
— Norm Eisen (@NormEisen) July 9, 2020
Strong move by Judge Sullivan asking the Court of Appeals to re-hear the Michael Flynn case “en banc.” This is a fight worth carrying out to the end.
— Elie Honig (@eliehonig) July 9, 2020