Thursday, July 17, 2025

QOTD -- SCOTUS Green Lights Trump's Authoritarianism

 

Adam Liptak writes in the NYT about the six Republicans on the Supreme Court increasingly ruling in favor of the Malignant Loser, without explaining their rationales:

In clearing the way for President Trump’s efforts to transform American government, the Supreme Court has issued a series of orders that often lacked a fundamental characteristic of most judicial work: an explanation of the court’s rationale.

On Monday, for instance, in letting Mr. Trump dismantle the Education Department, the majority’s unsigned order was a single four-sentence paragraph entirely devoted to the procedural mechanics of pausing a lower court’s ruling.

What the order did not include was any explanation of why the court had ruled as it did. It was an exercise of power, not reason.

The silence was even more striking in the face of a 19-page dissent by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

“The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naïve,” Justice Sotomayor wrote, “but either way the threat to our Constitution’s separation of powers is grave.”

The question of whether the nation’s highest court owes the public an explanation for its actions has grown along with the rise of the “emergency docket,” which uses truncated procedures to produce terse provisional orders meant to remain in effect only while the courts consider the lawfulness of the challenged actions. In practice, the orders often effectively resolve the case.

The court has allowed the administration to fire tens of thousands of government workers, discharge transgender troops, end protections for hundreds of thousands of migrants from war-torn countries and fundamentally shift power from Congress to the president — often with scant or no explanation of how it arrived at those results...

The six Republican justices are increasingly all-in on the Malignant Fascist's "Project 2025" dismantling of the rights, institutions, and separation of powers that have been the hallmarks of our liberal democracy for most of the last 50 years, and replace it with an authoritarian, unitary executive form of government.  Had two seats on the Court not been stolen by loathsome Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell (with a fair amount of Democratic passivity as his secret weapon), we would be in a vastly better place.

BONUS:  Salon's Alex Galbraith takes on the myth of Chief Justice Roberts' "moderation."

(Cartoon:  Mike Luckovich, Atlanta Journal-Constitution)


2 comments:

  1. I wonder if our boy Bart is in the Epstein Files. Certainly fits his youthful predilections. I wouldn't be surprised if Thomas and Alito were, and given that grin Roberts.

    They're all those kind ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ten Bears -- True. Kavanaugh and Thomas would be my most likely candidates.

      Delete