National security analyst Marcy Wheeler examines the timeline of the Malignant Fascist's links to teenager Virginia Giuffre, who worked at the Mar-a-Lago spa, and according to the MF was "stolen" by pedophile sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein to work for him. Here's an excerpt, but read the entire excellent post:
"What I’m interested in with the possibility that Trump cut off Epstein for recruiting at Mar-a-Lago is the timing Trump just laid out.
Epstein stole an employee (hypothetically, Giuffre, in 2000). Trump told Epstein not to do it again. And then — possibly the event that led to the 2007 removal — “he did it again.”
Right in-between those incidents, in 2002, Trump told New York Magazine that Epstein liked his girls (Trump called them 'women') young. [snip]
And then, according to WSJ, in 2003, Trump or his staff sent Epstein a birthday letter referencing secrets and enigmas, with Trump’s signature appearing like pubic hair. [snip]
If Donald Trump learned what happened to Giuffre and warned Epstein never to recruit sex slaves at Mar-a-Lago again, it would mean he was aware of what happened to Giuffre, aware years before law enforcement first started investigating Epstein. It would mean he learned Epstein was trafficking girls, which that New York Magazine quote sure seems to reflect, and rather than do something to make Epstein stop, Trump just told him not to do it at Mar-a-Lago." (our emphasis)
As Wheeler suggests, the MF apparently acknowledged that he was aware of Epstein's abuse of the underage girls that he "poached" from Mar-a-Lago over a period of years. That knowledge could only come from someone who participated in covering up Epstein's crimes, and who may have been part of them at some point. Giuffre sadly took her own life earlier this year, but her testimony / statements in the trials of Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell would tell the story. It fills in some of the blanks that would explain the MF's desperate attempt to keep the files on Epstein hidden, and to distract the public from them.
No comments:
Post a Comment