Showing posts with label Mike Roman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mike Roman. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 4, 2024

Fake Electors Charged In Wisconsin

 



Justice delayed, but not denied?

Three men involved in the so-called fake electors scheme to keep former President Donald Trump in office following his 2020 election loss have been charged in Wisconsin, according to court records.

Mike Roman, a Philadelphia native who served as the Trump campaign's head of Election Day operations, was charged Tuesday, as was Kenneth Chesebro, an attorney who struck a plea deal with prosecutors in a separate 2020 election case in Georgia in October. James Troupis, a former judge and Trump campaign attorney, was also charged in connection with the fake electors scheme.

Chesebro, Roman and Troupis are all charged with felony forgery, according to court records. They are charged for their role in getting a slate of pro-Trump electors to sign paperwork attesting, falsely, that Trump had won Wisconsin in the 2020 election. Similar slates of fake electors for Trump were organized in several states and charges have been brought in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada and Georgia.

Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat who brought the case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The fake electors scheme is a major component of the charges that special counsel Jack Smith has brought against Trump in federal court in Washington, D.C. That case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, is currently on hold while the Supreme Court decides on Trump's claim of absolute immunity from prosecution. The trial is unlikely to go forward before Election Day.

Chesebro and Troupis previously settled a lawsuit related to the fake electors in Wisconsin that resulted in the release of more than 1,000 pages of emails and text messages, though neither man admitted any liability or culpability. The released documents revealed more information about the scheme in Wisconsin, and 10 of the fake electors in the Badger State admitted as part of litigation in December that President Joe Biden won the state in 2020.

In Wisconsin and the four other States where felony charges have been filed against fake Trump electors, the involvement of the convicted felon Malignant Loser is always in the background. With the Federal election interference/ coup trial on hold, or perhaps kiboshed by the Republican Supreme Court, these judicial forums may be the only places where we'll see a measure of justice done, particularly if one or more defendants flips and provides evidence of the convicted felon Malignant Loser's active participation in the schemes.

(Photo:  Troupis, Chesebro, and Roman / AP, Getty Images)


Friday, June 30, 2023

More Charges For Trump As Rats Leave The Ship?

 


There's been a flurry of stories recently about new developments in both the classified documents case and the January 6 investigation, featuring Malignant Loser insiders who may provide testimony under penalty of prosecution.  Earlier this month, it was revealed that former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows had testified on both the classified documents case and the attempt to overturn the 2020 election. Now, we're seeing more rats possibly leaving the good bad ship SS Trump.

The Department of Justice is prepared to seek indictments against multiple figures in former president Donald Trump’s orbit and may yet bring additional charges against the ex-president in the coming weeks, The Independent has learned.

According to sources familiar with the matter, the department has made preparations to bring what is known as a “superseding indictment” — a second set of charges against an already-indicted defendant that could include more serious crimes — against the ex-president in the Southern District of Florida.

But prosecutors may also choose to bring additional charges against Mr Trump in a different venue, depending on how they feel the case they have brought against him in is proceeding.  [snip]

The team of federal prosecutors working under Special Counsel Jack Smith is currently prepared to add an “additional 30 to 45 charges” in addition to the 37-count indictment brought against Mr Trump on 8 June, either in a superseding indictment in the same Florida court or in a different federal judicial district. In either case, they would do so using evidence against the ex-president that has not yet been publicly acknowledged by the department, including other recordings prosecutors have obtained which reveal Mr Trump making incriminating statements.

Additionally, it is understood that Mr Smith’s team is ready to bring charges against several of the attorneys who have worked for Mr Trump, including those who aided the ex-president in his push to ignore the will of voters and remain in the White House despite having lost the 2020 election.

"Attorneys" like Rudy "Toot Toot" Giuliani:

Mr Giuliani, whose law license was suspended in New York and Washington as a result of his allegedly making multiple false representations while seeking to help Mr Trump overturn his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden, reportedly participated in a voluntary interview with prosecutors working under the supervision of Mr Smith, the Justice Department special counsel whose office brought charges against Mr Trump earlier this month.

It is further understood that Mr Giuliani’s cooperation with prosecutors was undertaken as part of what is known as a “queen for a day” deal, under which the ex-mayor can avoid indictment for anything he tells prosecutors about during the interview.

This will allow the disgraced former federal prosecutor to avoid some charges, but a source familiar with the matter has said Mr Smith’s office will “most definitely” bring some charges against Mr Giuliani for his work on Mr Trump’s behalf in the weeks between the November 2020 election and the 6 January 2021 attack on the Capitol.

The Independent has also learned that Mr Giuliani’s “proffer” session with prosecutors dealt mainly with Mr Trump’s machinations during that time period as he sought to find a way to remain in the White House for a second term, even against the will of the voters who’d handed Mr Biden the keys to the White House by way of majorities in key swing states, including Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona.

It was earlier reported that the Special Counsel has also identified the person in the blockbuster tape of the Malignant Loser showing them a classified document he had no business having, and then proceeded to show them to that person, who didn't have security clearance:

One of the top advisers on Donald Trump's 2024 campaign is among the individuals identified but not named by special counsel Jack Smith in his indictment against the former president for allegedly mishandling classified documents after leaving the White House and obstructing the government's efforts to retrieve them, sources familiar with the matter told ABC News.

Susie Wiles, one of Trump's most trusted advisers leading his second reelection effort, is the individual singled out in Smith's indictment as the "PAC Representative" who Trump is alleged to have shown a classified map to in August or September of 2021, sources said.

Trump, in the indictment, is alleged to have shown the classified map of an unidentified country to Wiles while discussing a military operation that Trump said "was not going well," while adding that he "should not be showing the map" to her and "not to get too close."...

She and others the Special Counsel has identified in that meeting will be called to testify under oath.

Then there's this guy:

A top official in Donald Trump's 2020 campaign team who was a key part of the fake elector scheme to overturn the results in favor of the former president is cooperating with federal prosecutors, according to reports.

Mike Roman was director of Election Day operations for Trump's campaign. He has spoken to Special Counsel Jack Smith's office as part of the expansive criminal investigation into attempts to overturn the last election and into the events that led up to the January 6, 2021 attack, reported CNN.

Roman reportedly spoke to prosecutors under what is known as a proffer agreement. This means he can share information with investigators on an understanding that the statements will not be used against him in future criminal proceedings. Roman also may not have to appear before the grand jury as part of the agreement. It is unclear what precisely Roman was asked about during his meeting with prosecutors, or what information he may have provided...

So many rats...

(Cartoon: Dave Whamond, caglecartoons.com , from December 2020)