(click on image to enlarge)
More Americans were shot to death by March 6 this year than died on D-Day https://t.co/JrGF4XKPvk pic.twitter.com/7epXWESF6Y— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) June 6, 2019
Perspectives on politics, culture, and the media since 2006
More Americans were shot to death by March 6 this year than died on D-Day https://t.co/JrGF4XKPvk pic.twitter.com/7epXWESF6Y— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) June 6, 2019
Do you notice we are not having a gun debate right now? That's because they used knives and a truck!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 4, 2017
A 45-year-old man shot and killed five people at his former workplace in an industrial area near Orlando Monday morning before turning the gun on himself and committing suicide, authorities said.
At a press conference later Monday, Orange County Sheriff Jerry Demings said the suspect worked for Fiamma Inc., an RV accessory company where the incident took place, until he was fired in April.
“He was a disgruntled employee that came back to this business this morning,” Demings told reporters, adding that there was no indication the shooter had any links to terrorism.
“This is likely a workplace violence incident. We will get more into the details of the investigation as it unfolds,” Demings said.
Demings identified the shooter as John Robert Neumann Jr., a white 45-year-old U.S. Army veteran who was discharged in 1999. He lived alone and has no family in the area, he said.We await the Giant Toddler's tiny fingers pounding out a tweet initiating a debate on gun violence any moment now.
All decent people feel sorrow and righteous fury about the latest slaughter of innocents, in California. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are searching for motivations, including the vital question of how the murderers might have been connected to international terrorism. That is right and proper.Let's pause to note that those "elected leaders... who place a higher premium" on campaign donations and stoking voter turnout than our safety are, with a few grotesque exceptions, Republicans. Let's also pause to note the "industry dedicated to profiting" from the carnage is not about hunters, sportsmen or collectors - it's about the gun manufacturing industry and their spokestoadies, the National
But motives do not matter to the dead in California, nor did they in Colorado, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia, Connecticut and far too many other places. The attention and anger of Americans should also be directed at the elected leaders whose job is to keep us safe but who place a higher premium on the money and political power of an industry dedicated to profiting from the unfettered spread of ever more powerful firearms.
It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency. These are weapons of war, barely modified and deliberately marketed as tools of macho vigilantism and even insurrection. America’s elected leaders offer prayers for gun victims and then, callously and without fear of consequence, reject the most basic restrictions on weapons of mass killing, as they did on Thursday. They distract us with arguments about the word terrorism. Let’s be clear: These spree killings are all, in their own ways, acts of terrorism. (our emphasis)
About half [52%] of all Americans oppose stricter gun control laws, a larger segment of the population than those who support tighter controls on guns, according to a new CNN/ORC poll released Wednesday. (our emphasis)Let's note that poll was taken three weeks after the mass shootings in Roseburg, Oregon, in October that left 9 people dead. The epidemic is on us and it's spreading because, instead of tackling the problem head on, a majority of us are coming up with the wrong answers.
... a United States federal law [was enacted] that included a prohibition on the manufacture for civilian use of certain semi-automatic firearms it defined as assault weapons, as well as certain ammunition magazines it defined as "large capacity."
The ten-year ban was passed by the U.S. Congress on September 13, 1994, and signed into law by President Bill Clinton the same day. The ban only applied to weapons manufactured after the date of the ban's enactment, and it expired on September 13, 2004, in accordance with its sunset provision.
Several constitutional challenges were filed against provisions of the ban, but all were rejected by reviewing courts. There were multiple attempts to renew the ban, but none succeeded.During the decade since the ban expired, Congress has become all the more beholden to/ afraid of the National
Senior Republican officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were discussing confidential conversations, said that Mr. Boehner had long been suspicious of the administration’s handling of the attacks and that Mrs. Clinton’s emails gave him a way to keep the issue alive and to cause political problems for her campaign. But he thought that the task was too delicate to entrust to others and that it should remain with Mr. Gowdy, the former prosecutor.Of course, just as this and this didn't do it, this nugget buried deep in the Times article won't stop the Republicans' politicization of the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi!!! or cause this on- going fiasco to be righteously hammered in the media. No, Republicans are too invested, and there are too many Republican- wired folks in the media who are also depending on it to continue. Exhibit A is the ever- awful Chris Cillizza, political horse race tout of the
The important question in this debate is one that is out of her hands. How hard do any of her opponents go after her, and on what? Does the controversy over her e-mail server come up? If so, who does the attacking, and how negative (if at all) does Clinton go in return?This fool, emblematic of our puerile, superficial media, will be watching for attacks on Hillary Clinton, who'll "go after her, and on what." Yes, that's truly the "important question in this debate." Hopefully the cast of Democratic debaters will disappoint him and the other shit- stirrers in the media and their Republican Party handlers by refusing to be sidetracked by this concocted "controversy."