(click on images to enlarge)

(David Horsey, Los Angeles Times)

(Mike Luckovich, Atlanta Journal-Constitution)

(Jim Morin, Miami Herald)

(Lalo Alcaraz, via gocomics.com)
Perspectives on politics, culture, and the media since 2006




“These guys are there looking for a fight. These guys are clearly quasi-fascist, classic protofascists, and they’re on the track to full-fledged fascism. All we need to do is look at history and see how it happened.”
How many "last straws" can there be before the nation finally sees Trump as a demented, dysfunctional threat to our success & even survival?— Laurence Tribe (@tribelaw) May 2, 2017
Taken as a package, the 100 Days interviews sound like evidence submitted in an involuntary commitment hearing to a mental institution.— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) May 2, 2017
I just died. .@realDonaldTrump pic.twitter.com/XWelK06uVW— ❄️ Dr. A ❄️ (@AAPsyc) May 2, 2017
Democrats think they have set the stage to block President Trump’s legislative priorities for years to come by winning major concessions in a spending bill to keep the government open.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) secured nearly $5 billion in new domestic spending by exploiting disagreements between Trump and GOP lawmakers over spending priorities.
Democrats’ lopsided victory on the five-month deal, which is likely to be approved this week, means it will be very difficult — if not impossible — for the GOP to exert its will in future budget negotiations, including when it comes to Trump’s 2018 budget blueprint. [snip]
In addition to the $5 billion in domestic spending, the bipartisan agreement released early Monday morning is packed with Democratic priorities, such as protection for funding for Planned Parenthood, a permanent extension of health care for coal miners and money to help Puerto Rico make up a projected shortfall in Medicaid.The reaction from bestest negotiator Donald "Rump" Trump when he heard that Democrats were celebrating was characteristically childish:
The reason for the plan negotiated between the Republicans and Democrats is that we need 60 votes in the Senate which are not there! We....— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 2, 2017
either elect more Republican Senators in 2018 or change the rules now to 51%. Our country needs a good "shutdown" in September to fix mess!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 2, 2017
... Trump’s involvement was seen by many congressional aides as unhelpful to reaching a deal in the bipartisan talks. Negotiators were nearing an agreement on the spending portions and were ready to move on to unrelated policy measures when [OMB Director Mick] Mulvaney publicly renewed demands that the bill include money for a wall along the southern border.
Mulvaney’s demand was out of sync with GOP leaders, who long ago said they wouldn’t seek any funding for a wall or cuts to sanctuary city funding.So you could say Rump's involvement was "The Shart of the Deal" (we just did!).



Frustrated by the president’s obvious ignorance, juvenile impetuousness and endless norm-breaking, elite commentators have started resorting to a kind of Pygmalion punditry. To show how smart they are, these pundits have begun considering Trump in much the same way Professor Henry Higgins did Eliza Doolittle—as mostly a problem of manners and refinement to solve.
This fan fiction is little more than an intellectual dodge, however, where the press helpfully reimagines Trump as he might be, rather than analyzing him for what he really is. Less than three weeks before the election, for example, Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan (10/20/16) produced her own pretentious entry in this genre under the headline “Imagine a Sane Donald Trump.” Her ostensibly critical piece was really an act of rhetorical jiu jitsu—praising Trump with faint damnation. Her Higginsesque focus rests almost exclusively on remaking Trump’s style and messaging, which often suffers from turning conservative subtext into too-obvious text. Notably, Noonan doesn’t bother much with recasting Trump’s actual policies into “sanity.”Richardson has some fine examples of this yearning to "refashion Trump into something he's not" from other pundits like Tom Friedman, Ross Douthat, Fred Hiatt, David Ignatius, and Gerald Seib. Needing to maintain access to power, these and other chin strokers -- and, sadly, many in newsrooms as well -- have a need to pursue a fiction that only the most deluded could believe after observing Rump in the arena for decades: the notion that somehow, someway Trump is going to change! pivot! moderate! mature!
... a desperate attempt at projecting onto a radical, reckless and dishonest Trump the favored policies and norms of the media establishment[.]So, the next time you hear the slogan "Democracy Dies In Darkness," remember who helped remove the light bulbs.
MURDOCH statement to Fox News employees pic.twitter.com/5bEdcuyntQ— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) May 1, 2017
Shine’s departure now marks the third major firing of longtime Fox personnel in the wake of the network’s multiple sexual harassment scandals, along with Roger Ailes and longtime star host Bill O’Reilly.
Last week, Fox host Sean Hannity reacted with alarm to news that Shine might soon be on his way out the door, and even claimed that his firing would be “the end of Fox News as we know it.”We can only hope, Sean baby, we can only hope.
President Donald Trump said he would meet with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un amid heightened tensions over his country’s nuclear weapons program if the circumstances were right.
“If it would be appropriate for me to meet with him, I would absolutely, I would be honored to do it,” Trump said Monday in an Oval Office interview with Bloomberg News. “If it’s under the, again, under the right circumstances. But I would do that.” (our emphasis)"Honored," said one dangerous Giant Toddler to the other dangerous Giant Toddler. The same Kim who, it is estimated, has murdered over 300 people since coming to power five years ago, including his uncle and half- brother, some by anti- aircraft gun. The same Kim whose regime routinely threatens to rain nuclear hell on the United States and its allies South Korea and Japan.
In an interview set to air Monday, President Donald Trump mused about the Civil War and former President Andrew Jackson, saying he does not know why the Civil War couldn’t “have been worked out.” Speaking with Salena Zito on Sirius XM radio, Trump said the Civil War wouldn’t have happened if Jackson had been president at the time. “He was a very tough person, but he had a big heart. He was really angry that he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War. He said, ‘There’s no reason for this,’” Trump said, incorrectly stating that Jackson reacted to the Civil War. Jackson died in 1845, while the war did not start until 1861. Trump added: “People don’t realize, you know, the Civil War, if you think about it, why? People don’t ask that question, but why was there the Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out?” (our emphasis)That's someone who is profoundly and serenely ignorant, who is at the same time "ignorant of his ignorance" (h/t Josh Marshall). To give him credit for even the simplest thought is to raise the bar waaay too high.
President Trump gave a lengthy interview Sunday morning to CBS’ John Dickerson about the Republicans’ health care plan.
His responses to basic questions — like what provisions the bill includes or how it would change the health insurance system — suggest he either doesn’t understand how the American Health Care Act works, or doesn’t want to tell the truth about it. (our emphasis)It's not necessarily either/ or, is it? How about "both."
Something, something, pants on fire. https://t.co/Jb6Xofkhvc— Indivisible Guide (@IndivisibleTeam) April 30, 2017