The Supreme Court is set to issue its decision in June in the King v Burwell case, regarding subsidies in state-run Obamacare exchanges. The suit depends on a willful misinterpretation of the law brought about by a drafting glitch that normally would be left to the discretion of the executive branch administering it. But, with partisan hacks embedded throughout the judiciary, nothing is "normal" any more. The public, however, is on to them (via Yahoo News):
(AP) — Many people in the United States doubt that the Supreme Court can rule fairly in the latest litigation jeopardizing President Barack Obama's health care law.Mr. Lewis, by his observation, shows more clarity and ethical propriety than the minimum 4 Supreme Court justices that agreed to listen to this bogus suit in the first place.
The Associated Press-GfK poll finds only 1 person in 10 is highly confident that the justices will rely on objective interpretations of the law rather than their personal opinions. Nearly half, 48 percent, are not confident of the court's impartiality."That lawsuit should have never made it this far," said Hal Lewis, a retiree from Scranton, Pennsylvania. (our emphasis)
Great job, "Justice" Roberts!
