In America you can’t even get a parking ticket based on hearsay testimony.— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) September 28, 2019
But you can impeach a president?
I certainly hope not.
It has been a while since you’ve practiced law, so let me help:— George Conway (@gtconway3d) September 28, 2019
* @realDonaldTrump’s incriminating statements are binding admissions against him and are not hearsay under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2);
* Even if that were not so, the statements would be admissible ... https://t.co/8eWOOjZUYy
The transcript of Trump’s call with the Ukrainian President was non-hearsay and would be admissible against him. Any lawyer, like yourself, should know that. https://t.co/0IX0TBsYzR— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) September 28, 2019
Well, in the federal system you 100% can get an indictment based on hearsay, @LindseyGrahamSC. And that's what impeachment in the House would be. So, just stop. https://t.co/w1rKwoypNs— Mimi Rocah (@Mimirocah1) September 28, 2019
The White House itself released a memorandum of the telephone conversation, and the president has admitted to wrongdoing, even if he claims not to understand why it’s wrong. Nearly every Trump ally’s defense has been an effort to gaslight America. https://t.co/XToqHizgBp— Justin Amash (@justinamash) September 28, 2019
Can you even remember what it’s like to feel shame at this point?— Kevin M. Kruse (@KevinMKruse) September 28, 2019
We've wondered for some time now what kompromat the Russians have on Huckleberry. Maybe we'll find out sooner rather than later?